Which Topics Should Be Discussed In The Sprint Review?

Which Topics Should Be Discussed In The Sprint Review
Which Topics Should Be on the Sprint Review Agenda? | Wrike Scrum Guide An effective Sprint review meeting agenda should cover new features, sprint impediments, and an assessment of whether the sprint goal was achieved. Sprint reviews typically last two to four hours and feature a product demonstration where a working version of the latest increment is presented and inspected.

What is discussed during sprint review?

What Happens During a Sprint Review? – As the name implies, a sprint review takes place at the end of a sprint. It’s when the team presents the results of the project. The team assesses whether they met their goals, and discuss how they can improve upon the product.

Sprint reviews include the product owner, Scrum team, stakeholders, and a Scrum Master, They are typically held at the end of each sprint and take between one and two hours. During each one, the product owner — who is held accountable for the entire team’s work — explains the concept and nature of the work and its overall importance toward achieving the final goal.

Because Scrum methodology promotes collaboration and shared responsibility, every Scrum team member can participate in the review. However, sometimes the teams are so large, the product owner only invites the key stakeholders interested in the output of that particular sprint.

What should we not do during sprint review?

Subscribe to our blog for the latest updates on new articles The Sprint Review seems like one of the simplest Scrum events to execute, yet many teams tend to miss this key opportunity to inspect the progress of work. From my experience working with a variety of teams with different levels of experience, most teams see the Sprint Review as a “demo”, which is partially correct, but not entirely the intent of this event.

In order to reap the benefits of the Sprint Review, teams should focus on assessing the work that has been completed, sharing progress, challenges, and issues, and most importantly, get feedback from the stakeholders.
There are many ways to lose focus in a Sprint Review, and I would like to share a few that I have personally witnessed.

Take a look below and see if you have experienced these also, then think about whether it makes sense to avoid these traps. Which Topics Should Be Discussed In The Sprint Review During your Sprint Review, you should NEVER

Demonstrate incomplete work – There are different opinions regarding whether a team should showcase only completed work or also discuss incomplete work in order to demonstrate a concerted effort had been made by the team. My thinking is that showing incomplete work, while consistent with the value of transparency, can add more risk than benefit to the team due to potential misunderstanding of the current state of the project. My recommendation is to focus on the positives – the completed functionality – then discuss any issues or roadblocks that prevented other work from being completed as planned. Say “We planned too much/too little work” – Since a Scrum team creates a forecast of what they believe can be completed during a Sprint, the plan should not be considered a “forecast” or a “prediction”. The team should not dwell on whether too much (or too little) work was planned, but rather, focus on the value delivered. A good question to ask: “Did the value that the team delivered to meet the expectations of the Product Owner?”. Say “We need to complete more points next sprint” – To augment item #2 above, the goal of the Scrum team is to deliver value, not points. There is not necessarily a direct relationship between the volume of points (story points) that a team produces to the actual value delivered to the customer/end-user. Asking for or pushing for more points is not the appropriate way to focus the team, since this can lead to point inflation which adds no benefit to anyone. The team should try to focus on the best way to deliver more value through improvements in efficiency, automation, and other innovation. Say “We have nothing to show” – In the unlikely event that the team is unable to complete any tangible functionality within a sprint, which may happen, the team should try to focus the Sprint Review on progress made and obstacles that were encountered. This may feel like a Retrospective discussion, but that’s okay; if the team is in this situation, then it is important to have a dialog around what happened and what needs to be changed to improve the outcomes for the next sprint. Present slides instead of inspecting work items – The Sprint Review is designed for teams to demonstrate a working product instead of talking about the product and what it could have been. Hence, avoid the temptation of showing PowerPoint slides and talking only about metrics; while important, metrics are not what the customers pay for, and they would benefit from seeing the actual product, even if it is not 100% complete. In the event that functionality requires significant time to execute (i.e. a process that must run for several minutes or hours to complete), it is okay to show a screenshot of the inputs and outputs of that process.

To close out this article, the key takeaway is that a Sprint Review is designed to provide another opportunity to inspect and adapt; the customer/stakeholder will appreciate the transparency and visibility into how things are progressing, even if the outcome is not exactly ideal.

What is the first thing we should see at sprint review meeting?

1. Summarize the work done in Sprint – The Sprint review starts with the Product Owner presenting the sprint goal set for this Sprint. PO also presents the backlog items that associate with this sprint goal. The product owner explains what Product Backlog items have their status as ” Done ” and ” Not Done “.

What is discussed in sprint meeting?

What is sprint planning? – In Scrum, every project is broken into time blocks called sprints, usually two to four weeks long. A sprint planning meeting is when the team (including the Scrum Master, Scrum Product Manager, and Scrum Team) meets to determine which backlog items will be handled in the next sprint.

How many topics are addressed in sprint planning?

Conclusion – Sprint Planning is an important part of the Agile development process that helps teams stay focused and productive. By addressing these three topics during Sprint Planning, teams can ensure they are taking all necessary measures to complete their projects on time and within budget.

Having a thorough understanding of these three topics can make teams confident that they are setting themselves up for a successful Sprint. If you’re looking for a way to easily manage your Sprint Planning and ensure that all the necessary topics are addressed, GoRetro can help. Our Sprint Planning tool makes it easy to track progress and see how different tasks fit into the bigger picture.

We provide a simple, straightforward format so that keeping up with sprints is effortless. Give us a try today and take control of your Sprint Planning process!

What are the three topics to be covered during scrum planning meetings?

Best describes the topics covered in Sprint Planning Last post 05:25 pm December 23, 2022 by Reindolf Asante-Manu 06:11 am December 19, 2013

Hi,
could you please help me with the following question?
Which answer best describes the topics covered in Sprint Planning?

1What can be done and how to do it.2What went wrong in the last Sprint and what to do differently this Sprint.3Who is on the team and what team member roles will be.4What to do and who will do it.5How conditions have changed and how the Product Backlog should evolve. I think answer 1 is right or? 06:35 am December 19, 2013 > I think answer 1 is right The question isn’t simply asking for the right answer, it’s asking for the best one. The process of evaluation is important. So, why do you believe answer 1 is the best? Can you explain why the other options don’t seem to be as good? 06:57 am December 19, 2013

Hello Ian,
i think:
2: It is input for other Meeting 3: Scrum team member roles (PV, DT and Scrum Master) must be clear by beginning the project and when changed not input for sprint Planning meeting
4: who will do it discuss in daily scrum
But im not sure righty answer is number 1 or 2

08:03 am December 19, 2013

2: It is input for other Meeting
Yes, what went wrong & what to do differently should be discussed in a Sprint Retrospective, not Sprint Planning
3: Scrum team member roles (PV, DT and Scrum Master) must be clear by beginning the project and when changed not input for sprint Planning meeting

Membership could potentially change as an adaptation following a Sprint Retrospective, but it would be unusual to do so. You are right that the matter has nothing to do with Sprint Planning.4: who will do it discuss in daily scrum The team can make tentative plans for the allocation of work to team members during Sprint Planning.

However, any such plans are subject to modification during the Daily Scrum, or indeed at any point.
Therefore, this is not likely to be the best answer.
What about number 5 though? Should a Scrum Team look at “how conditions have changed and how the Product Backlog should evolve”? If so, can you identify the Scrum Event that is most suitable for that purpose? Yes.

Check requirements / conditions changed is important! And impact must be considered into PB.1 and 5 correct. But detailed and important statement answer 5. Thank you for your help Ian 🙂 Hi Mandy, For (5), would you consider the Sprint Review event to be more appropriate? I would say that answer 5 is more about Backlog Grooming and Sprint Review but can be done in any Scrum event as all of them are an opportunity to inspect and adapt.

Hi Darya,
From an assessment perspective, I would select 1.
If there’s more clarification needed, I would encourage people to look at the Scrum Guide’s section on “Sprint Planning.”

09:53 pm December 22, 2022 Sprint Planning answers three questions; Why, What, and How. The answer is 1. Why this/these PBIs? Usually answered and clarified by the Product Owner, after which developers should have the courage to voice their concern if they think otherwise, then the whole team can respectfully deliberate on it and agree.

What activities are part of sprint review?

What happens in a Sprint Review? – A Sprint Review includes the following events:

Attendees include the Scrum Team and key stakeholders if invited by the Product Owner;The Product Owner discusses the ‘done’ and ‘what has not been done’ items of the Product Backlog,The Development team explains what went well during a Sprint, what obstacles they faced, and how they resolved those problemsThe Development team elaborates the ‘done’ work, and justifies the Increment,The Product Owner discusses the Product Backlog. He or she projects likely target and delivery dates based on progress to date (if needed)The team collaborates and plans for the next Sprint goal. In this case, Sprint Review helps with the valuable inputs for the upcoming Sprint Planning,The team does a research on the marketplaces and decides on the next to-do product accordingly. Also, the team estimates the budget, potential capabilities, timeline, and marketplaces for the upcoming releases based on the functionality of the product.

What is a common sprint review mistake?

User Story doesn’t meet the necessary requirements – User story requirements are criteria that determine what exactly needs to be implemented to consider the user story ready for end-users. In a bad Sprint Review meeting, functionality that doesn’t meet the criteria can be shown as final and brought up to the necessary requirements only in the next sprint.

What does Scrum Master do during sprint review?

2. Hosts Daily Stand-up Meetings, Sprint Planning Meetings, Retrospectives and Reviews – The Scrum Master will facilitate and host all the Scrum events, including Sprint Planning Meetings, Daily Stand-up Meetings, Reviews and Retrospectives. Sprint Planning Meeting The Scrum Master in this meeting shall prevent the development team from being over-ambitious by selecting more Product Backlog items than they can deliver. While the Scrum Master is not required to be a part of the Daily Scrum, he or she should make sure that the development team conducts it on time. In case the development team is distributed, the logistics to coordinate the Daily Scrum are made available to the development team. Sprint Review The Scrum Master is a part of the review meeting and captures the feedback raised by the stakeholders. This feedback is used to take inputs from the team in the retrospective meeting. Sprint Retrospectives The Scrum Master conducts the retrospective meeting, noting down the areas of improvement that were suggested by the team. At times, the Scrum Master could ask someone else to conduct the retrospective meeting so as to get a different point of view on the process improvement.

Who should demo in sprint review?

#8. Who leads the Sprint Review? – The Scrum Master facilitates the Sprint Review, and the demo is done by the Product Owner, mainly. But the team member should have the opportunity to demo as well.

Is sprint review first or retrospective?

Sprint Retrospective – The sprint retrospective meeting takes place immediately after the sprint review. While the sprint review is a discussion about what the team is building, the sprint retrospective is focused on how they’re building it. This meeting is usually slightly shorter than the sprint review and shouldn’t last more than three hours per month-long sprint.

To get the most out of a sprint retrospective meeting, you should ensure that the whole Scrum team, including the product owner, attends and participates. The goal of a sprint retrospective is to improve the development process. The Scrum team reflects on the previous sprint and discusses what’s working well, what could be improved, and how they could improve overall productivity.

Although these improvements may be implemented during the sprint, the sprint retrospective gives the Scrum team a formal opportunity to discuss the process and motivates each team member to voice their opinion and ideas. Which Topics Should Be Discussed In The Sprint Review For a successful sprint retrospective meeting, each team member should try to answer the following sprint retrospective questions:

What went well during the sprint?
Is there anything that can be improved?
How can we make those improvements?

Instead of using the sprint retrospective as an opportunity for complaints, this meeting should be constructive with everyone on the team making an effort to improve the process and create an enjoyable work experience for the whole team. When organizing sprint review and sprint retrospective meetings, it helps to have a dedicated task management tool.

What is discussed in daily sprint?

A Guide to Daily Scrum Meetings | Wrike Scrum Guide A daily Scrum meeting (also known as a stand-up meeting) is a short, time-boxed meeting where members of the Scrum team gather to provide updates on what they worked on the previous day, what they plan to do today, and what (if any) impediments or issues they have encountered.

Stand-up meetings are one of the and are a process built into Agile Scrum that encourages problem-solving, self-organization, and continuous improvement. Daily Scrum meetings are short and typically last 15 minutes. To reduce complexity, the daily stand-up meeting is ideally held at the same time and same place every day.

Some teams even hold the meeting standing up to emphasize its time sensitivity. Ultimately, daily Scrum meetings enable teams to work through issues and constantly plan, reflect on, and synchronize activities that are in service of the sprint goal. : A Guide to Daily Scrum Meetings | Wrike Scrum Guide

What is done during sprint review and retrospective?

Differences between Sprint Reviews and Sprint Retrospectives – The key difference is that a Sprint Review focuses on improving so the team can deliver a better product, whereas a Sprint Retrospective focuses on improving the overall system so the team can work more harmoniously and find flow together.

Sprint Reviews focus on what’s been “shipped” At the end of each Sprint, the team looks at what deliverables have been shipped or marked as done.
The review is a time to assess whether the workload was fair, whether the team was equipped to deliver the objective, and whether the definition of ‘shipped’ or ‘done’ needs to change due to other circumstances affecting the product.

Whereas Sprint Retrospectives focus on the human side of work Because Sprints are inherently about teamwork, Sprint Retrospectives seek to improve the overall Sprint process, encourage certain actions, course-correct if external circumstances harmed the Sprint, and discuss other issues that may have arisen and impacted the Sprint’s success.

The goal of a retrospective is similar to the Japanese concept of ‘kaizen,’ which means continuous improvement. Each retrospective looks for small ways to get just a bit better. Over time, each small improvement compounds and the team becomes significantly more capable. ⏱ Sprint review and retrospective meetings may be different lengths Typically, a Sprint Review meeting is scheduled for one hour per week of the Sprint if there’s a lot to discuss.

On the other hand, retrospectives are typically held once every two weeks, with 30-45 minutes budgeted to cover each week of the Sprint. There is some debate about how frequently to run retrospectives or how long retrospective meetings should be, so the 30-45 min per week is a guideline.

What does Scrum Master do during sprint review?

What is done during a sprint review meeting quizlet?

A Sprint Review is held at the end of the Sprint to inspect the Increment and adapt the Product Backlog if needed. During the Sprint Review, the Scrum Team and stakeholders collaborate about what was done in the Sprint.