Ruby Radio

Listen and fall in Love

What Is The Purpose Of A Serious Case Review?

What Is The Purpose Of A Serious Case Review
Serious case reviews (SCRs) aim to provide learning about how to improve practice around safeguarding safeguarding Safeguarding means: protecting children from abuse and maltreatment. preventing harm to children’s health or development. ensuring children grow up with the provision of safe and effective care.

Safeguarding children and child protection – NSPCC Learning

, Multi-agency safeguarding work is complex and there is limited guidance for local safeguarding children boards (LSCBs) and reviewers around setting up and carrying out reviews.
Serious Case Reviews (SCRs) were established under the Children Act (2004) to review cases where a child has died and abuse or neglect is known or suspected. SCRs could additionally be carried out where a child has not died, but has come to serious harm as a result of abuse or neglect.

They aim to establish learning for agencies and professionals to improve the way that they work together to safeguard children. A local safeguarding children board (LSCB) can commission a review for any case where it suspects anything can be learned to improve local practice. Working Together to Safeguard Children (Department for Education, 2018) changed the structure of these reviews, now known as Child Safeguarding Practice Reviews (SPRs).

Responsibility for learning lessons lies with a new national panel – the Child Safeguarding Practice Review Panel (the Panel) – and with local safeguarding partners. The Panel and local partners help to identify serious child safeguarding cases that may raise issues of national importance.

abuse or neglect of a child is known or suspected the child has died or been seriously harmed.

For Designated Safeguarding Leads and others with responsibility for safeguarding in schools, learning from reviews is important to improve the way that children and young people are protected. Under Working Together to Safeguard Children’s new arrangements, the education sector is seen as a ‘relevant agency’ but not a statutory partner.

It is therefore important for schools to inform the process of learning and think strategically about any possible cases that may help to inform and drive practice in education – advocating for this view with safeguarding partners to inform the commissioning of SPRs. SCIE’s Learning Together model takes a systems-thinking approach to establishing the best evidence and draws out the deeper systems issues that help or hinder professionals and organisations to safeguard effectively.

Learning Together underpins our approach to audit, independent incident reviews and conducting SCRs. Find out more at Practice issues from Serious Case Reviews – learning into practice

What is the role of the SCPB?

The Safeguarding Children Partnership Board (SCPB) works to protect children from all kinds of maltreatment, whether by parents and carers, members of the public, or by those working with children across the Island’s services.

What is the name of a serious case review?

You can view all the latest published Safeguarding Practice Reviews on the NSPCC Repository – Sign up to the Pan-Dorset Safeguarding Children Partnership Newsletter here To view the Child Safeguarding Practice Review National Panel’s annual reports, please see here

What SCR factors make abuse more likely?

Abstract – Aim To identify the common factors in serious case reviews (SCRs) where a child has died of a medical cause. Design Qualitative thematic analysis. Background SCRs take place when neglect or abuse results in children dying or being seriously harmed.

  • Nown key factors within SCRs include parental substance misuse, mental health problems and domestic abuse.
  • To date, there has been no investigation of children who die of a medical cause where there are concerns about child maltreatment.
  • Data sources A list of SCRs relating to deaths through medical causes was provided from previous coded studies and accessed from the National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children National Case Review Repository.
See also:  How To Review Coinbase Transaction History?

Twenty-three SCRs with a medical cause of death from 1 April 2009 to 31 March 2017 were sourced. Results 20 children died of an acute condition and 12 of a chronic condition; 20 of the deaths were unexpected and maltreatment contributed to the deaths of 18 children.

  1. Most children were aged either 16 years at the time of death.
  2. Many parents were caring for a child with additional vulnerabilities including behavioural issues (6/23), learning difficulties (6/23), mental health issues (5/23) or a chronic medical condition (12/23).
  3. Common parental experiences included domestic violence/abuse (13/23), drug/alcohol misuse (10/23), mental ill health or struggling to cope (7/23), criminal history (11/23) and caring for another vulnerable individual (8/23).

Most children lived in a chaotic household characterised by missed medical appointments (18/23), poor school attendance (11/23), poor physical home environment (7/23) and disguised compliance (12/23). All 23 SCRs reported elements of abusive or neglectful parenting.

  • child protection
  • general medicine (see internal medicine)
  • quality in health care

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial.

What is a common feature of serious case reviews?

Carrying out a child safeguarding review –

  1. Local authorities must notify the Child Safeguarding Practice Review Panel and relevant safeguarding partners within five working days if they know or suspect that a child has been seriously harmed or died because of abuse or neglect.
  2. The Secretary of State and Ofsted must also be notified if a looked after child has died, whether or not abuse or neglect is known or suspected.
  3. The Department for Education (DfE) has published .
  4. Local safeguarding partners must then undertake a rapid review within 15 working days. The rapid review should:
  • assemble the facts of the case
  • establish any immediate action needed to ensure a child’s safety
  • consider the potential for practice learning
  • decide what steps they should take next, including whether a child safeguarding practice review should be commissioned.

As soon as a rapid review is complete, the safeguarding partners should send a copy to the Panel. If the safeguarding partners determine that the issues raised by a case are of local importance, they may also commission a local child safeguarding review.

See also:  How To Write A Book Review Ks2?

They must inform the Panel, Ofsted and DfE that they are conducting a review, and share the name of the commissioned reviewer. Once the Panel receives the rapid review they must determine, based on the complexity or national importance of the case, whether to commission a national child safeguarding practice review.

If the decision is made to proceed with a national review, the Panel will agree the scope and methodology with the local safeguarding partners and engage with them and others involved in the case. The Panel may also decide to commission a thematic national review, bringing together learning around a specific topic from a number of different incidents.

  • reflect the child’s perspective and the family context
  • be proportionate to the circumstances of the case
  • focus on potential learning
  • establish and explain the reasons why the events occurred as they did
  • include a brief overview of the key circumstances, background and context of the case
  • provide a summary of why relevant decisions by professionals were taken
  • critique how agencies worked together and identify any shortcomings
  • consider whether any shortcomings are features of practice in general
  • consider what would need to be done differently to prevent harm occurring to a child in similar circumstances
  • provide recommendations for what needs to happen to ensure that agencies learn from this case

(Child Safeguarding Practice Review Panel, 2019).

When should the Local Safeguarding children Board undertake a serious case review?

Role – The Serious Case Review Panel supports local safeguarding children boards ( LSCBs ) with independent advice to ensure that all parties learn from serious child protection incidents. LSCBs will conduct a serious case review ( SCR ) when a child is seriously harmed or dies as a result of abuse or neglect.

What does SCR mean in abuse?

The New York State Office of Children and Family Services’ web-based Online Clearance System supports the mandate under Section 424-a of the Social Services Law for legally authorized agencies to inquire of the Statewide Central Register of Child Abuse and Maltreatment (SCR) as to the existence of any indicated reports

What is the cause of SCR?

Temperature/Overheating – Inadequate cooling of semiconductors such as SCR and Diodes can and will cause devices to fail prematurely, some in a matter of minutes depending on the amount of current being carried. If you are experiencing recurring device failure it may be caused by a lack of cooling.

What group is at highest risk for abuse?

Chronological age of child: 50% of abused children are younger than 3 years old; 90% of children who die from abuse are younger than 1 year old; firstborn children are most vulnerable.

What type of abuse causes incontinence?

Sexual abuse can cause physical damage to a child’s anal and genital area and/or result in sexually transmitted infections that affect continence. sexual abuse may also lead to an overactive bladder (Lai et al, 2016)

What is a serious case review Kingston?

When are they held? – Section 44 of The Care Act 2014 requires Safeguarding Adults Boards to undertake a Safeguarding Adult Review when specific criteria are met. This is when abuse results in the death or significant and possibly life-changing harm of an adult with care and support needs. Read Government information about the Care Act 2014 and SARs,

See also:  How To Write A Movie Review?

What factors have featured in reports into serious cases of abuse and neglect?

Serious case reviews and case reviews take place where a child or an adult at risk has been seriously harmed or has died or where abuse appears to have been engrained within the practices. They are conducted by the local authority (Knows as a Safeguarding Adult Board SAB) and are responsible for safeguarding the area in which they took place, outcomes of these are usually published in the press.

They can lead to change in local and/or national policy. Where there is a concern about a serious case the government can set up a formal inquiry to investigate what went wrong and to recommend what needs to change. These are followed by a formal report. Serious case reviews, case reviews and inquiries do not decide who was guilty but they look at what went wrong and how to prevent it from happening again.

Decisions about who was responsible for the death or injury/who was guilty are made through the courts. Some of the factors featured in reports from serious case reviews (now SARs) are :

Poor or a lack of communication between services, including not sharing important information Ineffective partnership working between services Those receiving care and support or their families and friends not being involved in decisions made about their care A failure to identify signs of abuse Lack of management support or presence Limited learning and development opportunities for workers Poor staff recruitment processes

E xamples of serious case reviews involving adults:

Serious Case Review – Winterbourne View (2013 South Gloucestershire Council). This involved the psychological and physical abuse of patients in a private hospital for people with learning disabilities. When the scandal emerged the government responded by publishing a series of guidance documents which aim to prevent the same situation arising elsewhere. Serious Case Review – – Steven Hoskin (2007 Cornwall County Council). A man who had learning difficulties living on his own is St. Austell who was murdered by people in the community. The police, social services and health failed to respond to his requests for help and him alerting them to the dangers he was facing. Serious Case Review – Gemma Hayter (2010 Warwickshire Council) Gemma was beaten to death in August 2010 at the age of 27, agencies missed 23 opportunities to initiate safeguarding procedures or otherwise intervene to improve the quality of life. A highly significant recently completed inquiry led to the Francis Report which focused on the abuses which took place at the Mid-Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust, published in February 2013. www.nhsemployers.org/The-Francis-Inquiry/Pages/Francis.aspx,

Use to answer question 10.1i of the Care Certificate