What Does Review Mean On A Background Check?

What Does Review Mean On A Background Check
A ‘Review Needed’ status means that your background check report is complete and it returned information for review with the company who requested the background check. This information could include things like criminal records, traffic infractions, or possibly other information.

What is background review mean?

Background check is a process by which a person or company uses to verify that a person is who they claim to be, and provides an opportunity for someone to check a person’s criminal record, education, employment history, and other activities that happened in the past in order to confirm their validity.

What does needs review mean?

If you receive a report that has an item marked as ‘Needs Review’ that means that this item did not come back as completely clear or verified.

What does it mean when the background check is in progress?

It means they’re still running the background check.

What does it mean when it says clear on a background check?

Background Check FAQs – UNC Human Resources SHRA employees who are promoted and transfer to a new position of a different appointment type (i.e., SHRA to EHRA or EHRA to SHRA) must have a new background check. EHRA Non-Faculty employees who are making a job change to a new position, either through a competitive recruitment or a waiver of recruitment from the Equal Opportunity and Compliance (EOC) Office, must also have a new background check.

Faculty must have a new background check when they are promoted conferring tenure and when there is a temporary to permanent job change.
If a background check has been completed within the last twelve (12) months, the results may be used for a subsequent position or appointment if it meets the criteria of the new position.

If it does not meet the criteria for the new position, additional background check components will need to be completed. The Background Check Supervisor or Background Check Consultant, in consultation with the respective central office (e.g. Employment, Academic Personnel Office (APO), EHRA Non-Faculty HR, etc.), will assess whether or not the previous background check results are valid based on the requirements of the new position/appointment and included, driving, professional licensure, degree verification, or debarment checks (when applicable).

What is the difference between background and review?

What Does Review Mean On A Background Check Don’t be too hard on yourself if you didn’t realize the study background and literature review were two distinct entities. The study background and literature review are both important parts of the research paper; however, due to their striking similarities, they are frequently confused with one another 1,

In this article, we will look at the key differences between the background of a study and literature review and how to write each section effectively. When it comes to similarities between the study background and the literature review, both provide information about existing knowledge in a specific field by discussing various studies and developments.

They almost always address gaps in the literature to contextualize the study at hand. So, how do they differ from one another? Simple answer: A literature review is an expanded version of the study background, or a study background is a condensed version of a literature review.

The background of a study is discussed at the beginning of the introduction while the literature review begins once the background of a study is completed (in the introduction section).
The study background sets the stage for the study; the main goal of the study background is to effectively communicate the need for the study by highlighting the gaps in answering the open-ended questions. In contrast, a literature review is an in-depth examination of the relevant literature in that field in order to prepare readers for the study at hand, Furthermore, the literature review provides a broad overview of the topic to support the case for identifying gaps.
The study background and literature review serve slightly different purposes; the study background emphasizes the significance of THE study, whereas the review of literature emphasizes advancement in the field by conducting a critical analysis of existing literature. It should be noted that a literature review also identifies gaps in the literature by comparing and analyzing various studies, but it is the study background that summarizes the critical findings that justifies the need for the research at hand.
Another interesting difference is how they are structured; the study background structure follows a top-down approach, beginning with a discussion of a broader area and eventually narrowing down to a specific question—study problem—addressed in the study.

The length of the background of the study and the literature review also differ, with the former being more concise and crisp and the latter being more detailed and elaborate.

Tips to effectively write the background of the study Writing the background of the study is sometimes a difficult undertaking for early career researchers; however, because this is an important component of the paper, it is critical that once write it clearly and accurately.

The background must convey the context of the study, defining the need to conduct the current study 2, The study background should be organized in such a way that it provides a historical perspective on the topic, while identifying the gaps that the current study aims to fill. If the topic is multidisciplinary, it should concisely address the relevant studies, laying the groundwork for the research question at hand.

To put it simply, the researchers can follow the structure below:

What is the state of the literature on the subject?
Where are the gaps in the field?
What is the importance of filling these gaps?
What are the premises of your research?

The idea is to present the relevant studies to build the context without going into detail about each one; remember to keep it concise and direct. It is recommended that the findings be organized chronologically in order to trace the developments in the field and provide a snapshot of research advancements. What Does Review Mean On A Background Check Tips to write the literature review without mixing it up with the background of the study As previously discussed in this article, the literature review is an extended version of the background of the study. It follows the background of the study and presents a detailed analysis of existing literature to support the background.

Authors must conduct a thorough research survey that includes various studies related to the broad topics of their research. Following an introduction to a broader topic, the literature review directs readers to relevant studies that are significant for the objectives of the present study. The authors are advised to present the information thematically, preferably chronologically, for a better understanding of the readers from a wide range of disciplines.

This arrangement provides a more complete picture of previous research, current focus, and future directions. Finally, there are two types of literature reviews that serve different purposes in papers; they are broadly classified as experimental and theoretical literature reviews.

Qureshi, F.6 Differences between Study Background and Literature Review. Editage Insights, May 3, 2019. https://www.editage.com/insights/6-differences-between-a-study-background-and-a-literature-review,

Sachdev, R. How to Write the Background of Your Study. Editage Insights, November 27, 2018. https://www.editage.com/insights/how-to-write-the-background-of-your-study,

Is it OK to ask the status of background check?

Many of us applying for jobs routinely sign off on the paperwork to grant background checks. But how many of us actually follow up and request to read the results? After reading this story, you’re never going to pass up that chance again. A screening company and school district are both getting slammed with a lawsuit by a Minnesota woman who claims an error on her background check cost her a prestigious volunteer position and ruined her reputation,

Wosmek begins volunteering in her sons’ classrooms and coaching for one of their football teams in the Remer School District She had submitted to routine screening before, but a background check in 2012 turned up a supposed criminal vehicular homicide conviction. The information was wrong. Employees and fellow volunteers throughout the district start to treat Wosmek strangely FIVE MONTHS LATER Wosmek finds out she’s no longer approved as a volunteer while on a field trip and, later, a letter arrives from the school district with a copy of the incorrect background check results. Wosmek eventually files a lawsuit and, in court filings, the company who conducted Wosmek’s background check admits the vehicular homicide conviction was a mistake.

So what’s the big takeaway from this story? It depends on if you’re the employee or the employer. Let’s start with the former. Employees – You can ask to see the results of your background check report at any time from the agency who conducted it. The name of the agency was likely on the consent form you signed during pre-hiring.

If you don’t remember it, you can certainly ask the employer to supply you with the name of the screening agency.
The screening agency should provide you with a copy of your results for free and in a timely manner.
Sometimes, it’s a good idea to run a background check on yourself.
That way you know if anything is wonky before you start a formal job search and can take the appropriate action to correct any erroneous information.

Active Screening is happy to help you with this task. Here’s what action this article from Chron you can take if something is wrong on your report: Credit Information – If you were notified by a potential employer that something negative turned up on your credit report, you can request a free credit report from any agency who complies with the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA).

You can then contact the Credit Reporting Agency (CRA) and ask them to change the information.
You may need to provide additional information to verify your identity.
Education – Call your school’s registrar or office of student affairs to confirm your standing and history with them.
Then ask them to contact your screening agency to re-verify the information.

Criminal Background Information – Cases of misidentification (such as with Wosmek) can be cleared by contacting the courthouse where the supposed offense happened and requesting a security clearance. You may need to provide personal identifying information to verify your identity and pay a fee for this service.

If the error occurred through an FBI fingerprint report, you’ll need to go to its website and fill out the appropriate forms.
It’s important to know that you CAN correct erroneous information, but that an employer is under no obligation to HOLD a job for you while you do this.
Employers – Two of the biggest FCRA rules that employers repeatedly fail to comply with are Authorization and Adverse Action.

Violations of these routinely get even the most seasoned and robust American companies into trouble with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), the government agency responsible for overseeing the proper use of FCRA. Adverse Action is, essentially, when an employer decides not to hire an applicant based on the information in the background check.

This is what apparently happened in Wosmek’s case (the process is the same for volunteers). But there are some steps that employers must take to comply with FCRA and stay in the FTC’s good graces. Before you tell the candidate you’re not hiring them based on information collected in the background check (in itself, called Adverse Action), you must give the applicant: •A pre-adverse action notice that includes a copy of the background check you used to make your determination •A copy of “A Summary of Your Rights Under the Fair Credit Reporting Act.” Your screening agency should supply you with this.

Once this pre-adverse action notice is completed, the candidate can review the information and explain or ask for a correction of any negative information. If this doesn’t happen within a reasonable amount of time, you can move forward with your Adverse Action notification: •You must tell the applicant in person, in writing, or electronically that he was rejected because of information in the report •Include the name, address and phone number of the screening agency •Inform the applicant that the screening agency didn’t make the hiring decision and doesn’t know why you weren’t hired •Ensure the applicant knows that she can dispute the information in the report, ask for a correction and request a free report from the same agency within 60 days.

What does issue for review mean?

What Does Review Mean On A Background Check Document Distribution Matrix is a systematic organised matrix for the document and drawings to be distributed to related persons or organisations for their information, review and approval, record, and use for further actions. The Document Distribution Matrix includes lists of key project positions or organisations on one side and types of documents on the other.

Document Numbering System is a document management system that defines numerical sequences with varying combinations of project specific identification codes for correspondence with other documents, and requires logging, issuing, and tracking. The Document Numbering System must be developed early in the project.

Document Review and Approval Category is defined by the importance of document and information that is for information, for review, for approval, and for record. There are: IFR (Issued for Review), IFA (Issued for Approval), IFD (Issued for Design), IFH (Issued for HAZOP for P&IDs), FCR (Issued for Client Review), FCA (Issued for Client Approval), AFD (Approved for Design), and IFC (Issued for Construction) or AFC (Approved for Construction) aligning with the work process completed.

Approved for Constriction (AFC) means that the document or drawing was reviewed and approved by authorities of internal and external organisations including the client representatives for the construction.
A Construction team must use only an AFC marked or stamped drawings and documents for the construction works and activities.

Approved for Design (AFD) means that the document and drawing was reviewed and approved by a dedicated and authorised person or organisation for use, mainly further design development, and procurement. Issued for Approval (IFA) means that the document or drawing is issued for client or delegated authorised person/ organisation to review and approval to use of them for further developments or activities.

E.g., Project Critical Document including P&ID, Plot Plan, etc.) Issued for Construction (IFC ) means that the document or drawing which are categorised as the review, and Issued for Construction.
Issued for Design (IFD) means that the document or drawing is issued for further development of design or used for other disciplines’ design.

Issued for Information (IFI) means that the document or drawing is issued for information only. (e.g., Progress Status Reports, Detailed Calculations, etc.) Issued for Review (IFR) means that the document or drawing is Issued for internal or external Review (IFR) or Client Review (FCR).

E.g., Project non-critical Document, etc.) Issued for HAZOP (IFH) means that drawings (P&IDs) and documents are issued for the HAZOP review.
FCA stands for Issued for Client Approval FCR stands for Issued for Client Review Document Review and Approval Cycle is a period of time frame for the update and revise the document and drawing in accordance with the review results including a specified review meeting, and update and re-issue.

Document Revision Control is a process of information sharing and communicating between a series of draft documents which leads to a final and to be used for further design development. The Document Revision Control is applied the unique identifier for every released document that is revised to identify the latest version of the document and differentiate between drafts or previously and final approved versions of the document, and to track changes by different users.

Refer to the Document Revision Numbering System) Document Revision Numbering System is an engineering and design document control system to ensure that the project members are informed any design changes and the latest information. The common revision system is using a numeric (1, 2, 3 ) and/or alphabetic sequence (A, B, C ).

After the initial issue of a document and followed by changes or further design developments, all revisions will be assigned the next higher alphabetic or numeric character. (e.g., Issued for Internal Review: A1, A2,; Issued for Client Review: B1, B2,; Issued for FEED: 0A, 0B,; Issued for Design and Construction: 01, 02,).

What do you mean review?

What is a basic definition of review ? – A review is judgement or discussion of the quality of something. Review also means to go over a subject again as part of study or to look at something another time. Review has many other senses as both a noun and a verb.

Real-life examples : You can find reviews of almost anything online, such as movies, books, vacation spots, and schools. Websites like Amazon, Google Maps, and Rotten Tomatoes offer reviews of things. Most companies will even boast about good reviews that they get.
Used in a sentence : I want to see the new movie because I heard it got good reviews.

Review is used in this sense as a verb to mean to write or otherwise create (like a video) a review of something.

Used in a sentence : Cho began her career by reviewing television shows for her YouTube channel.

Review is also used to mean to go over a subject again to master it or to remember the material better. Your school teachers likely reviewed previous lessons with your class more than once before a test. When studying a new language, you will review words and grammar rules many times to help commit them to memory.

Real-life examples : One of the main reasons teachers assign homework is so students will review the topics they learned that day. College students will often review an entire semester’s worth of notes the night before an important exam.
Used in a sentence : Diego reviewed the geometry chapters with his tutor to understand the math better.

Review is used in this sense as a noun to refer to an exercise or session that involves reviewing subject matter.

Used in a sentence : Prof. Lopez led the review of the properties of the noble gases.

As a verb, review can also mean to read, view, or look at something again.

Real-life examples : Someone putting together furniture will likely review the directions many times before they’re done. A chef will review a recipe that they are trying for the first time to make sure they don’t make a mistake. A writer will review their work for errors or grammar mistakes before giving it to an editor.
Used in a sentence : Lola reviewed her letter to Santa Claus to make sure she included everything she wanted.

What does giving a review mean?

: to go over or examine critically or deliberately. reviewed the results of the study. : to give a critical evaluation of.

Should I be worried if my background check is taking a long time?

Delays in any necessary process can feel frustrating and worrying, especially when it comes to pre-employment screening. A delayed background check can lead to anxiousness whether you’re a job candidate or a hiring manager. Thankfully, they are rarely a cause for concern.

Background checks can be extensive processes that require strict attention to detail. If false information is in the end report, it could sabotage your entire hiring process. This post will take you through some of the leading causes of delay throughout the screening process. By the end, we’re sure you’ll feel completely reassured that everything is proceeding as it should.

Let’s get into it!

What causes a delayed background check?

Federal Categories of Persons Prohibited from Receiving Firearms – A delay response indicates the subject of the background check has been matched with either a state or federal potentially prohibiting record containing a similar name and/or similar descriptive features (name, sex, race, date of birth, state of residence, social security number, height, weight, or place of birth).

A person who has been convicted in any court of a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year or any state offense classified by the state as a misdemeanor and is punishable by a term of imprisonment of more than two years. Persons who are fugitives from justice. An unlawful user and/or an addict of any controlled substance; for example, a person convicted for the use or possession of a controlled substance within the past year; or a person with multiple arrests for the use or possession of a controlled substance within the past five years with the most recent arrest occurring within the past year; or a person found through a drug test to use a controlled substance unlawfully, provided the test was administered within the past year. A person adjudicated mental defective or involuntarily committed to a mental institution or incompetent to handle own affairs, including dispositions to criminal charges of found not guilty by reason of insanity or found incompetent to stand trial. A person who, being an alien, is illegally or unlawfully in the United States. A person who, being an alien except as provided in subsection (y) (2), has been admitted to the United States under a non-immigrant visa. A person dishonorably discharged from the United States Armed Forces. A person who has renounced United States citizenship. The subject of a protective order issued after a hearing in which the respondent had notice that restrains them from harassing, stalking, or threatening an intimate partner or child of such partner. This does not include ex parte orders. A person convicted in any court of a misdemeanor crime which includes the use or attempted use of physical force or threatened use of a deadly weapon and the defendant was the spouse, former spouse, parent, guardian of the victim, by a person with whom the victim shares a child in common, by a person who is cohabiting with or has cohabited in the past with the victim as a spouse, parent, guardian or similar situation to a spouse, parent or guardian of the victim. A person who is under indictment or information for a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year.

A delay response indicates that information you supplied on the ATF Form 4473 has been matched with information contained in the National Crime Information Center, the Interstate Identification Index, and/or the NICS Indices. Complete disposition information is not always available and a further review of these records is necessary.

The FBI exhausts all efforts to retrieve current record information by contacting all applicable law enforcement agencies, i.e., local, state, and federal courts, etc. The Brady Act allows three business days to find this information before an FFL can transfer a firearm. The FFL is not prohibited from transferring the firearm after three business days have passed; however, the FFL is not required to transfer the firearm.

The Privacy Act of 1974 restricts the dissemination of specific information to you via the telephone. You can obtain a copy (for a fee) of any identification record the FBI may maintain on you by contacting the following unit at the address and telephone number provided: Federal Bureau of Investigation Criminal Justice Information Services Division Attention: Summary Request 1000 Custer Hollow Road Clarksburg, WV 26306 Telephone Number: (304) 625-5590

What is the longest a background check can take?

How Long Does a Background Check Take? – Under perfect conditions, a background check takes one to three business days. However, one can take up to 14 days or longer, depending on the scope of the searches. There are steps built into the process that take time, such as:

Reviewing the list of job applicants Filling out the background check request form for each job candidate Reviewing security clearance information on things like criminal checks and employment screening Gathering release forms Vetting professional references

Some processes may be invisible to you, like communicating with your background check company or other third-party company. Third-party communications can have an impact on turnaround times. Understanding what to expect from a routine background check allows you to understand what may be causing delays, thus cutting down turnaround times.

What does ETA mean on background check?

5 REASONS THERE COULD BE A DELAY IN YOUR BACKGROUND CHECK – Has your background check company ever given you an Estimated Time of Arrival (ETA) for a report and then not met that ETA? The ETA comes from an average of searches. Some searches may require additional time to obtain court case information.

What is the difference between search and review?

Difference between literature search and literature review – Researcher.Life What Does Review Mean On A Background Check Photo by Andrea Piacquadio from Pexels Differences between literature search and literature review You’ve just found out you need to do a literature review. You know the term literature search, but you’re not sure what the difference is between a literature search and a literature review.

This can be confusing if you’re just starting out in academia. Although literature search and review are related terms, they refer to different processes and functions. In general, a literature search is the process of seeking out and identifying the existing literature related to a topic or question of interest, while a literature review is the organized synthesis of the information found in the existing literature.

In research applications, a literature search is typically the first step of a literature review. The search identifies relevant existing studies and articles, and the review is the end result of analyzing, synthesizing, and organizing the information found in the search.

The following summarizes the literature search and review concepts as researchers typically practice them.
Literature search A literature search is a systematic search for existing information on your question or topic 1,
The purpose of a literature search is to aid in the formulation of a research question and study design.

When you are planning to conduct a study on a specific topic, the literature search helps narrow the focus of your study by identifying areas in which knowledge gaps exist. The search of existing studies can also guide the research design by suggesting appropriate methodologies and important variables.

Identify key words to use when searching through library and internet resources.
Search multiple databases for relevant articles, books, and other scholarly writings.
Use articles similar to your proposed study to find additional keywords.
Start with the most recent articles and work backward in time if necessary.
Include conference papers in your search as they generally represent the latest research.
Cast a wide net by searching in databases that might be unrelated to your topic.
Keep in mind that literature searches are iterative processes. Find new key words and articles through the references and citations in other relevant sources.
Make sure to document all of the articles you identify as relevant to your topic. This will save you time and frustration later when you want to find them again and when you need to write references for your literature review.

Literature review In a literature review, the results of a literature search are used to produce an organized and coherent presentation of the relevant knowledge about a specific topic. This is accomplished through reviewing, evaluating, analyzing, and synthesizing the information found through a search.

An effective literature review clearly places the proposed study in the context of previous research studies and identifies a gap in the knowledge that will be addressed by the proposed study.
A good literature review serves to demonstrate the depth of your knowledge and understanding of the topic; it is not simply a summary or description of those studies 2,

Here are some tips in conducting an effective literature review process.

Identify a wide range of articles using a literature search.
Evaluate those articles to determine which are relevant to your review 2, When evaluating the research, include considerations such as the significance of the study, the methodology, the value of the analysis, the structure of the article, and the overall effectiveness of the study.
Analyze the articles you’ve chosen to include. Critically and objectively review the study’s methods, results, and conclusions. Look for strengths and weaknesses. What can you learn from this study as it relates to your work?
Synthesize the information from all of the included sources. Look for patterns in the articles. What do they agree on? What do they disagree on? What is missing from the information?
Organize your literature review based on chronology, methodology, or themes. Again, this should not be merely a listing of the literature but a carefully structured whole.
Write your literature review using the format of an introduction, body, and conclusion.

Additional tips for researchers

Always strive for objectivity when conducting a literature search or review. Include all viewpoints and do not begin the process expecting a specific result. Avoid opinions.
Make sure your selected sources and your literature review work to place your study in the context of the existing literature.
The literature should reveal a knowledge gap that will be addressed by your study.
As with all writing, keep your audience in mind.

How do you write a background review?

What Does Review Mean On A Background Check While the findings of your study form the foreground of your research, it is equally important to establish the background of your study. A well-written background will provide your study with a context and prompt the readers to read the rest of your paper.

However, most authors struggle with writing the background of the study. Another common problem authors encounter is distinguishing between the background and the literature review, which are critical aspects of any research paper. The two terms are often used interchangeably; however, they have clearly defined roles.

So in this article, I will cover the basics of writing the background and explain how it is different from the literature review. The background of the study The background of the study establishes the context of the research. This section explains why this particular research topic is important and essential to understanding the main aspects of the study.

Usually, the background forms the first section of a research article/thesis and justifies the need for conducting the study and summarizes what the study aims to achieve.
How to structure the background In this section, the author usually outlines the historical developments in the literature that led to the current topic of research concisely.

If the study is interdisciplinary, it should describe how different disciplines are connected and what aspects of each discipline will be studied. Does your publication goal seem near yet too far? Explore the #POWERofMORE – the boost you need to achieve all your goals Click here to know more! Additionally, authors should briefly highlight the main developments of their research topic and identify the main gaps that need to be addressed.

What is known about the broad topic? What are the gaps or missing links that need to be addressed? What is the significance of addressing those gaps? What are the rationale and hypothesis of your study?

The background section, therefore, should provide general information about the topic of your research and emphasize the main aims of the study. Please ensure that you only discuss the main and relevant aspects of the studies that have led to your aims.

Do not elaborate on them as this should be done in the literature review section.
The background section should discuss your findings in a chronological manner to accentuate the progress in the field and the missing points that need to be addressed.
The background should be written as a summary of your interpretation of previous research and what your study proposes to accomplish.

How to make the background engaging As the background includes a lot of information, it can become a long drag, causing the readers to lose interest. To ensure that your background is engaging, you should try to build a story around the central theme of your research.

Ensure that the story adheres to the core idea and does not digress into a broad literature review.
Each idea should lead to the next so that readers are able to grasp the story and themselves identify the gaps that your study is going to address.
How to avoid common mistakes in writing the background While writing an effective background, you ought to steer clear of some mistakes.

The most common mistakes in writing the background include the following:

Don’t write a background that is too long or too short. Focus on including all the important details but write concisely. Don’t be ambiguous. Writing in a way that does not convey the message to the readers defeats the purpose of the background, so express yourself keeping in mind that the reader does not know your research intimately. Don’t discuss unrelated themes. Try and center your discussion around the pivotal aspects of your research topic i.e. highlight the gaps in the literature, state the novelty of the study, and the need to conduct the study. Don’t be disorganized. Not discussing the themes in a chronological manner can confuse the reader about the progress in the field, so try and organize your writing carefully.

How is the background different from the literature review Many authors find it difficult to discern the difference between the literature review and the study background. The literature review section should follow the background section, as the second section of your manuscript/thesis.

This section basically supports the background section by providing evidence for the proposed hypothesis.
This section should be more comprehensive and thoroughly describe all the studies that you have mentioned in the background section.
It should also elaborate on all studies that form evidence for the present study and discuss the current trends.

To write this section, you will need to do a thorough literature search on different studies that relate to the broad topic of your research. This will introduce the readers to the area of your research. Following this, you should present a more focused survey of the specific studies that are associated with the precise objective of your study.

It would be ideal to organize them thematically and discuss them chronologically so that readers are aware of the evolution and progress in the field. In other words, separate themes should be discussed chronologically to highlight how research in those fields has progressed over time. This will highlight what has been done and what are the future directions that need to be worked upon.

To learn in depth how to write a persuasive study background take this course: How to write an engaging background of the study for your research paper,

What is the difference between review and paper?

Difference between a Research Paper and a Review Paper Answer A research paper is based on original research. The kind of research may vary depending on your field or the topic (experiments, survey, interview, questionnaire, etc.), but authors need to collect and analyze raw data and conduct an original study.

The research paper will be based on the analysis and interpretation of this data.
A review article or review paper is based on other published articles.
It does not report original research.
Review articles generally summarize the existing literature on a topic in an attempt to explain the current state of understanding on the topic.

Review articles can be of three kinds: A narrative review explains the existing knowledge on a topic based on all the published research available on the topic. A systematic review searches for the answer to a particular question in the existing scientific literature on a topic.

A meta-analysis compares and combines the findings of previously published studies, usually to assess the effectiveness of an intervention or mode of treatment. Review papers form valuable scientific literature as they summarize the findings of existing literature. So readers can form an idea about the existing knowledge on a topic without having to read all the published works in the field.

Well-written review articles are popular, particularly in the field of medicine and healthcare. Most reputed journals publish review articles. However, you should check the website of the journal you wish to get published in to see if they accept such articles.

Why is my background check taking longer than a week?

Why Is My Background Check Taking so Long? – There might be an issue if your background check takes more than two weeks. It is also possible that your recruiter has rejected your application after checking your background. In such a case, you can expect your recruiter to contact you and clarify some details.

The delay can also be caused by the background check company as the higher authorities have a lot of tasks to deal with. Hence, you need to keep patience for some days even after the estimated time. Apart from this, there might be chances wherein the recruiters might have completed the background check but are unable to make the final decision.

The number of applicants can be a reason for this issue, which needs time to get resolved.

What do you say when you follow up on a background check?

The Follow-Up Email That Works Even Better Than ‘Just Checking In’

Fact #1: After you’ve interviewed for a job, hiring managers don’t always get back to you in the time frame they told you they would. Fact #2: You should absolutely with a polite email if you’re expecting to hear back and you haven’t. Fact #3: You can use this message not just to check in, but to give the decision-maker even more info that’ll show you’re the right person for the job. Watch On Forbes:

That’s right. Take this traditional “just following up” email: Hi Damon, I hope you had a great week. You had mentioned that you’d be in touch with next steps on the hiring process by Wednesday, so I just wanted to check in. Please let me know if there’s anything I can do to help with your decision.

Best, Adrian There’s nothing wrong with that note.
It’s brief, it’s polite and it gets your name in front of the hiring manager.
That said, instead of asking if there’s anything you can do to, in essence, boost your candidacy, why not take that next step and provide something that does just that? Let’s say you’re applying to a social media position with,

You might say something like this instead: Hi Damon, I hope you had a great week. You had mentioned that you’d be in touch with next steps on the hiring process by Wednesday, so I just wanted to check in. In the meantime, I wanted to share a social campaign that I launched this week.

It’s already had more than 5,000 shares—the company’s second most successful program ever. I think something similar to this would be very impactful for Dolby, and I’d be excited to jump right in and get started. Best, Adrian In this message, you’ve shared another example of your work, you’ve highlighted a recent success and you’ve reiterated your enthusiasm for the position.

And you’ve done so proactively, which is never a bad thing. You can tailor this template pretty easily if your work is online or easily sharable, like writing, marketing or design. Or, if your work or goals can be quantified—you’re in sales or account management, say—you might try something like this: In the meantime, I wanted to share that I finished this month as the #1 sales rep in the New York market.

It was a big honor, and also a reminder that I’m ready for my next challenge, hopefully as the Sales Manager at Dolby.
If your work is more behind-the-scenes, or you’re working on proprietary information that can’t necessarily be shared externally, you might consider describing a project you’re working on (one that could apply in some way to the job you’re applying for) in broader terms: In the meantime, I wanted to share that I just put the finishing touches on a crisis communications plan for one of our technology clients—a three-month process that involved collaborating with everyone from the customer success team to the CEO.

It was a great experience, and one that made me even more excited about the opportunity to work on the communications team at Dolby. Still stumped? Here’s something anyone, in any field, can do: In the meantime, I wanted to share an article that I published last week on LinkedIn, which was inspired by the conversation we had about,

It’ll give you a little more on how I think about, Thanks for the inspiration—I hope we have the opportunity to work together and have many more of these conversations. Assuming you’re not the only candidate in the pipeline, your “just checking in” email will probably be one of many sitting in the hiring manager’s inbox.

Use the opportunity not just to follow up, but to show once again why you’re the best candidate for the job. was originally published on, is the editor-in-chief of The Daily Muse. : The Follow-Up Email That Works Even Better Than ‘Just Checking In’

How do you write a background review?

However, most authors struggle with writing the background of the study.
Another common problem authors encounter is distinguishing between the background and the literature review, which are critical aspects of any research paper.
The two terms are often used interchangeably; however, they have clearly defined roles.

Usually, the background forms the first section of a research article/thesis and justifies the need for conducting the study and summarizes what the study aims to achieve. How to structure the background In this section, the author usually outlines the historical developments in the literature that led to the current topic of research concisely.

Do not elaborate on them as this should be done in the literature review section.
The background section should discuss your findings in a chronological manner to accentuate the progress in the field and the missing points that need to be addressed.
The background should be written as a summary of your interpretation of previous research and what your study proposes to accomplish.

Ensure that the story adheres to the core idea and does not digress into a broad literature review. Each idea should lead to the next so that readers are able to grasp the story and themselves identify the gaps that your study is going to address. How to avoid common mistakes in writing the background While writing an effective background, you ought to steer clear of some mistakes.

The most common mistakes in writing the background include the following:

This section basically supports the background section by providing evidence for the proposed hypothesis.
This section should be more comprehensive and thoroughly describe all the studies that you have mentioned in the background section.
It should also elaborate on all studies that form evidence for the present study and discuss the current trends.

It would be ideal to organize them thematically and discuss them chronologically so that readers are aware of the evolution and progress in the field. In other words, separate themes should be discussed chronologically to highlight how research in those fields has progressed over time. This will highlight what has been done and what are the future directions that need to be worked upon.

To learn in depth how to write a persuasive study background take this course: How to write an engaging background of the study for your research paper,

What does background mean in job?

What is a professional background? – A professional background is a summary of your professional experiences — coupled with any relevant personal information, including interests or passions — that you’ll use throughout your career as you network with industry peers, apply for new roles, or seek thought leadership opportunities.

Your professional background includes previous jobs you’ve had, successful projects you’ve worked on, significant accomplishments like promotions or awards, professional networking organizations you belong to, and anything else you’d share with someone who wants to know more about you professionally.

Not only is sharing more about your background a great way to tell more about yourself to others, it’s also an opportunity to wholly reflect on your professional journey and the goals you’ve achieved — plus, what you hope to achieve in the future. Next, let’s dive into how you can get started.

What does background mean in job application?

A professional background is a brief summary of your work history and performance at previous jobs. It is usually used during the job application process. This is more than just a list of prior positions you’ve held and should highlight your most significant and relevant achievements.

What is meant by background information?

Definition. Background information identifies and describes the history and nature of a well-defined research problem with reference to the existing literature.